The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
The author of the statement claims that in order to determine the greatness of a country than we have to look at how the general public is being treated not by the achievements of rulers, artists, or any other famous personality. Many of us will argue that this will hold all the time, while others will counter this. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the argument and will provide sound reasoning for the same.
We as human beings seen many rise and fall of many nations and civilizations, such as from the Indus valley civilization to the roman and now the current civilization. Many of these civilizations became very successful and many were failed to sustain for a longer period of time. But in order to determine whether the empire or a nation is great, we can have different approaches and a number of different factors on which the foundation of a great nation depends. The author recommended one approach to determine the greatness of the nation, to determine its effectiveness we have to analyze whether the recommendation is going to be the ultimate or best solution or we can have a much better and different approach or we can add some other point also to make it more effective.
First, if in a nation its people are not treated equally, no or less freedom of speech, people are not getting enough opportunities to grow and being suppressed by their government or king if they raise their against them, then we can say that the nation is not great, for example, in the People Republic of China the common public is not allowed to say anything about their government and their scheme and we are also aware of their brutality against their own citizens whenever they protest against them. So, it very much important for a country if they want to be called a great country that they should provide a healthy environment to their citizen, the environment in which they have right within certain laws, and have opportunities to grow and flourish and can put forward their opinion.
However, ignoring the leaders, famous personalities of a country is not a very good idea in determining greatness as they are also part of the society and have influence and good hold over the say of the common man because they are followed by the huge number of people and are considered as an idol. They have a huge impact on society and can bring changes in their society, for example, Martin Luther King an Africian American who raise the voice against racism in the USA, and soon he became the voice of the nation. His continuous efforts bring the change in the society as well as he was successful in compelling the government to pass the law that will protect their rights as well. So it will be a mistake to simply ignore them.
Last but not the least, they another and also as important the other factor is that how a nation treated other nations of the same, low and high level and of course their neighbor countries. If a nation has all the other factor that makes it great but their tendency is to bully the neighboring countries or threaten them, then according to me they are not great as we know great power comes with great responsibilities.
In sum, I would like to say that to become a great nation, the government should take of its citizens in the best possible and effective way and should have cordial relations with the other countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...country than we have to look at how the general public is being treated not by the achievement...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun rise seems to be countable; consider using: 'many rises'.
Suggestion: many rises
...or the same. We as human beings seen many rise and fall of many nations and civilizati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...any were failed to sustain for a longer period of time. But in order to determine whether the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ion its people are not treated equally, no or less freedom of speech, people are n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, then, well, while, for example, of course, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2781.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 600.0 442.535393258 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.635 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94923200384 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6000635676 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438333333333 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 871.2 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.305849292 60.3974514979 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.8125 118.986275619 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5 23.4991977007 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144737168051 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493866524277 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458733252883 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831030139032 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308808188343 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.1392134831 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.