Many people may argue that teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. But, what if we flipped the coin by suggesting that accomplishing better students' academic performance should be by elevating teachers' salaries?. In my opinion, teachers' salaries should not be affected by students' academic performance.
First, it is pervasive to assume that the performance of students in the class is an indication of the knowledge that they have retained and their development in the class. Students may learn valuable information and gain a worthy experience which may broaden their horizons and provoke their creative thinking. At the same time, this cannot be measured by their test results. Also, students may vary in their tendency to learn, learning abilities, and interests in the subject. So, the performance of students in the class is not a real reflection of the teacher's teaching methods and devotion to teaching. For example, students' grades in the same subject, taught by the same teacher, defer from year to year, and from student to student. Teachers can use a variety of teaching methods and technologies, but it is the student who plays the vital role in his achievement in the class.
Moreover, appraising the students' performance in the class as a holistic measure to the teacher's salary may corrupt the educational process. For instance, some teachers may be persuaded to boost the students' achievements by giving them easy tests or by giving them grades which they do not deserve. Thus, it is deleterious to subject the teaching profession to the influence of money, it is a novel profession, which plays a crucial role in shaping the future of the generations and greatness of the nation.
On the other hand, teachers should have a good quality of life to be efficient and more productive. Accordingly, this will escalate the academic performance of the students and enhance their learning experience. In contrast, if the teachers' income is limited, the teachers will be lax and would think of teaching as a transitory job yet forced to rethink their career, which will have a detrimental effect on the students and will deteriorate the educational system. In view of this, teachers should not struggle financially so they can focus on their critical work in the classroom. So, many countries, such as Finland, Japan, and Germany, tend to increase teachers' salaries to promote their performance and spark their creativity in teaching which has a positive effect on the quality of teaching there.
In conclusion, the teaching profession is critical and vital in the community. The quality of teaching can be enhanced by providing decent salaries to teachers and comfortable work environment, which will spark their enthusiasm and hard work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... the class. Moreover, appraising the students performance in the class as a holistic ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... the class as a holistic measure to the teachers salary may corrupt the educational proc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...earning experience. In contrast, if the teachers income is limited, the teachers will be...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21111111111 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90712959277 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457777777778 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2487830531 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389356403225 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146058019781 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127231440776 0.0758088955206 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248348758624 0.150359130593 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160814426654 0.0667264976115 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.