Quality education drives a nation forward. Having a good education perhaps equals to a promising future for students, and teachers play a significant role in it. In many countries, the teacher is not a lucrative profession. To make students achieve high academic performance, some teachers devote more effort and time in teaching. It is proposed that teachers should be compensated based on their teaching excellence. Some support this argument because they think teachers don’t get paid enough for what they contribute to our society. Others oppose this policy because teachers’ effort is not the only factor that affects students’ academic performance.
According to this policy, it is unfair to pay teachers who work in underdeveloped areas less than the ones who work in rich neighborhoods. Students from wealthy or highly educated families tend to perform better on academic than the ones who grew up in low-income families and whose parents did not receive higher education. More affluent students are more likely to take extracurriculars outside of school that further advance their academic performance. Therefore, based on the geological nature of schools, teachers would prefer to work in an institution that has more affluent students. This would exacerbate the education inequality between the riches and the poor.
Different regions have their own standards of academic excellence. This will directly impact teachers’ salaries, not students’ academic performance. For example, elite schools tend to have more difficult exams than public schools. Therefore, some elite schools may have lower grades than public schools. If this policy holds true, teachers in elite school would have lesser salaries than public school teachers. Many elite school teachers have more challenging duties than public school teachers, such as training students for competitions. It would be discrimination to elite school teachers.
On the other hand, some teachers should get paid more if they continuously help students achieving academic success, regardless of what institution the teachers work. Some teachers work in areas where the educational source is limited and still foster some of the best students in the country. These teachers should get rewarded, and one of the best ways to reword them perhaps is through financial incentives. This policy will recognize the teachers for their extra contribution and set a high standard for other teachers to look up to.
Therefore, teachers’ input does not directly affect students’ academic performance. It would be imprudent to compensate teachers based on their students’ achievements. But for teachers who constantly demonstrate their excellent teaching and improve students’ academic performance, these deserve to be awarded. And the best way to reward these outstanding teachers perhaps is higher paychecks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2480.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05914778746 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493087557604 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8477994171 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8518518519 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0740740741 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468356508153 0.243740707755 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145943159474 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14735403482 0.0758088955206 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302114852748 0.150359130593 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165906108587 0.0667264976115 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.