There are more than a single way to measure success, depending on one’s definition of success. Goals are set as director for human beings to thrive for and they are usually one of the best indicators to access one’s accomplishment. However, when evaluating one’s success, we should also take other factors into consideration, such as efficiency, the process, and the methods adopted to acclaim the fruits of victory.
There are other factors that are worth to consider other than the preset goals. The efforts that were put in during the process to achieve goals can be used as a success indicator. The goal can be seen as a collective process of work. Thus, we cannot ignore the value of the process of pursuing goals. In the meantime of approaching goals, many might encounter other findings that are also considered achievements and are valued successful. For instance, many biochemistry research ended up with results that were unexpected. The research outcomes might not have the same effect as they were intended to design for but they might be useful in other industries.
The time used in achieving a goal can be also used as a factor to access one’s success. Many share the same goals. Some might achieve them with shorter time. Thus, we can conclude that those individuals who achieve their goals within a shorter range of time have better efficiencies. Perhaps, faster development promises a one step closer to the next greater innovation. For example, the U.S. in the 1960s launched the Moon and started discovering the unexplored land. A few other countries have also launched their satellites around the Moon decades after. What made the U.S. stand out was that it was the first country that achieved the goal. Thus, it could utilize the rest of the time in searching for life signs and other aeroespacial research on the Moon while other countries were still building their spaceship.
Besides achievement, human beings also care about what approaches are made to attain success. Unethical and illegal methods to achieve success might cause the opposite effect. In the athletic world, there has been a long-lasting issue of drug-abusing in enhancing the athletes' performance. For example, it has been proved that some countries have been using medical injections to boost their athletes' scores. Although many athletes have broken new records because of the aid of drugs, the public should not evaluate their achievement as a success since their approach to success is not considered ethical.
Success has its own definition in every individual's mind. We shall not use a universal standard to judge everyone’s performance. Evaluations of time and efficiency, facets such as ethical methods used to approach success, and the efforts involved in pursuing success should also be valued to make the final judgment whether someone is successful or not..
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 75
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling 50
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 83
- "Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain 62
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: much might; a good deal of might
.... In the meantime of approaching goals, many might encounter other findings that are also ...
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun biochemistry seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much biochemistry', 'a good deal of biochemistry'.
Suggestion: much biochemistry; a good deal of biochemistry
...nd are valued successful. For instance, many biochemistry research ended up with results that wer...
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: MANY_NN
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun share seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many shares'.
Suggestion: Many shares
... a factor to access one's success. Many share the same goals. Some might achieve them...
Line 5, column 827, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...es were still building their spaceship. Besides achievement, human beings also c...
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'athletes'' or 'athlete's'?
Suggestion: athletes'; athlete's
... issue of drug-abusing in enhancing the athletes performance. For example, it has been p...
Line 9, column 359, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
...ent whether someone is successful or not..
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2437.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19616204691 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76111911383 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494669509595 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7935078095 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2592592593 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3703703704 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.62962962963 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151699690189 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461138421158 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431619562046 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950183699398 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421579239519 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.