Students should always question the education they receive. The instinct to question knowledge is a critical skill that will benefit students in their academic and professional journeys. Questioning course materials perhaps means that students are actively participating in the study. Because casting doubts on a subject requires students to think critically. Therefore, I strongly agree with the proposed idea that students should always question their given materials in school.
Students should be encouraged to question their learning materials when studying social science. Social science subjects, such as humanity, culture, and politics, have many variables. Cultural and political studies are heavily depending on geography and community traits. These facets do not stay unchanged. They change with time and migration of people. Thus, concepts and definitions vary as society moves forward. It is also possible that emerging concepts and studies will be introduced by social scientists every year. If students passively accept knowledge without questioning the validity, they might learn something outdated and not practical.
Students should also be encouraged to question natural science, but with caution. Our predecessors have developed natural science such as biology and chemistry. Most fundamental concepts were tested and factually correct. Students should trust reliable scientific findings and theories so that they can build a great foundation in science. It would be better for them to question the authority of some science when they comprehend the necessary knowledge.
The ability to question given materials enhances students’ problem-solving skills. Proving a course material wrong requires students to research and argue what they think it’s accurate. The process of research and reasoning trains students to be more prudent and detail-oriented. This skill of making rationales will also benefit students in their future careers. When it comes to a disagreement, students will know how to solve the issue with accurate methods and professional attitude. Thus, teamwork efficiency will improve.
However, teachers should teach students how to think critically and come up with valid doubts in students’ early ages. Students in elementary schools are still developing their perceptions of the world. It is important for someone to guide them and teach them skills like critical thinking. Therefore, teachers should not only teach students how to study but also teach them how to question properly. Learning such skills at an early age allows students to study independently when they enter higher education.
The education system should encourage students to question things they are not sure about. The freedom to propose question will not only refine the human knowledge base but also elicit better teamwork outcome in the professional world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re actively participating in the study. Because casting doubts on a subject requires st...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...riables. Cultural and political studies are heavily depending on geography and community traits. Thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2474.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79391100703 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83242465436 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529274004684 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7313298554 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.8064516129 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7741935484 23.4991977007 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.22580645161 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184270283229 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550749387179 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473951139901 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109179686974 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308971331148 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.71 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.