Education is a long-lasting perplex process that requires many inputs. For most children, they spend as much time in school as at home. Actively participating in children’s schools provides parents a fresh angle to look into their kids’ school life. It is argued that all parents should volunteer in their children’s school. I would contend that the debate is far too complex for a single answer to hold true in all conditions.
Parents with busy schedules for various reasons should not be required to volunteer at their children’s schools. Some parents may have multiple jobs because they need to support the family by making extra money. It is hard to ask those parents to devote more time to their children’s schools. Other parents who are in specific professions, such as doctors and CEOs, are usually too busy and have different priorities, such as taking care of their patients or maintaining companies. It is also not reasonable to take away their time from focusing on their careers.
It should not be a requirement to have parents volunteer at their children’s schools. Most parents are paying for their children’s tuition. Therefore, they are supporting their children’s education financially, and expecting their children will receive the best education as possible. Receiving tuition from the parents, schools have the responsibility to provide quality education to each child. In this situation, asking parents to volunteer in school work should not be mandatory.
However, participating in children’s schools does bring several beneficial effects to both parents and their children.
Volunteering at schools creates stronger family bonds between parents and children. This is an opportunity for parents to communicate with their children and get to know them more through academia. This opportunity also allows parents to work closely with teachers. Teachers don’t have to spend as much time to explain the grades of each student to their parents. Instead, parents and teachers can work together to customize study plans for each student. Teachers will have the chance to explain the merits and weakness of each child to their parents face to face. Therefore, parents will know how to assist children in their school work at home. Together, parents and teachers can help children to achieve a better academic outcome.
Participating in school work not only benefits children in their academic but also relieve parents’ stress by distracting their attention from work. Besides enhancing the family tide with their children, parents are also learning contemporary knowledge in class. For many professions, parents repeat the same tasks every day without too much active thinking and problem-solving skills. Joining the classroom with their children forces parents to think with the children and teachers. This mutual-learning experience can potentially awake parents’ curiosity in learning. Seeing their own parents’ eagerness to learn, perhaps is the best motive for children to study harder.
There are an equal amount of positive and negative effects if parents are involved in children’s schooling. In conclusion, this proposed idea should be a suggestive proposal to implement in education, but should not be enacted as a mandatory one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st motive for children to study harder. There are an equal amount of positive an...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 20, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...o study harder. There are an equal amount of positive and negative effects if par...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2834.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5568627451 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0785369034 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482352941176 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 829.8 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4798043741 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5625 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53125 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28951569248 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104275604894 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775974799879 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179083613111 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517680665406 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.