In any society, education is the key role playing member for the success and development and teachers / professors are the pilots of this ship. The salary of teachers has always been under discussion from decades as some of the people think that the salary of a teacher is always on the higher side. Those people relate the performance of associated students with the wages of teachers as, they say, this might increase the interest and passion levels in teachers resulting in higher productivity of education.
However, this is quite illogical to link the performance of one person with the wage of another person. Although the student and his / her professor are in mental and intellectual bond and their mutual harmony towards education is the key for success in this goal. But, on the other hand, this can create a negative impact on the personality of the teacher as he / she serves for a noble cause and we cannot fulfill the reward to our teachers at any cost. The teacher needs to have free mind all the time to concentrate over learning of his students rather focusing over just feeding the knowledge to get more money.
For instance, let's take the example of famous Anand Kumar from India. He was getting enough salary in return to his teaching services at one of the renowned tuition center in his country. One day, he thought of building an independent tuition corner and teach the poor children for free of cost. He selected 30 students all over the country and taught / trained them for the entrance test. Resultantly, all of them were selected in one of the top engineering colleges of country. The reason was that Anand Kumar was always free of mind and never thought about the performance of individual student.
Let's take another example. We all know that professors of MIT take the fixed salary irrespective of the academic performance of their pupils. Here we can analyze the performance of the students studying in MIT and the performance of the teachers as well. The MIT management does not focus over separate performance of students rather they reward their professors as per their efforts, hard work and technical & communication capabilities.
However, this is not the case all the time. Sometimes, we need to link the wage of a teacher with the performance of his students. Like in government schools, teachers do not pay full attention and concentration over their students as they are already getting full salary in any condition of the students' performance. In that case, we need to put a check and balance and accountability system over that group of teachers. But this is quite rare in selected portion of any country.
So in conclusion, it is expected to be more productive if we do not relate the wage of any teacher with the academic performance of his / her students. This is better for the society in the long run as education is the fundamental pillar for the development of a society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s been under discussion from decades as some of the people think that the salary of a teach...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...e performance of individual student. Lets take another example. We all know that ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 297, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ing full salary in any condition of the students performance. In that case, we need to p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85429141717 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73524723607 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455089820359 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.0 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6134927712 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184702805108 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517569951303 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542341806126 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105912292569 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03880484985 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.