Many may argue that teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. But, what if we flipped the coin by suggesting that accomplishing better students' academic performance should be by elevating teachers' salaries?. In my opinion, teachers salaries should not be affected by students academic performance.
First, it is pervasive to assume that the performance of students in the class is an indication of the knowledge that they have retained and their development in the class. Students may learn valuable information and gain a worthy experience which may broaden their horizons and provoke their creative thinking. This can not be measured by their test results. Also, students may vary in their tendency to learn, learning abilities, and interests in the subject. So, the performance of students in the class is not a reflection of the teacher's teaching methods and devotion to teaching. For example, students grades in the same subject, taught by the same teacher, defer from year to year, and from student to student. Teachers can use a variety of teaching methods and technologies, but it is the student who plays the vital role in his achievement in the class.
Moreover, appraising the students' performance in the class as a holistic measure to the teacher salary may corrupt the educational process. For instance, some teachers may be persuaded to boost the students' achievements by giving them easy tests or by giving them grades which they do not deserve. Thus, it is deleterious to subject the teaching profession to the influence of money, it is a novel profession, which plays a crucial role in shaping the future of the generations and greatness of the nation.
On the other hand, many countries tend to increase teachers salaries to promote their performance and spark their creativity of teaching. Teachers should have a high quality of life to be efficient and more productive. Accordingly, this will escalate the academic performance of the students and enhance their learning experience. In contrast, if the teachers' income is limited, the teachers will be lax and may think of teaching as a transitory job yet forced to rethink their career, which will deteriorate the students learning experience. In view of this, teachers should not struggle financially so they can focus on their critical work in the classroom.
In conclusion, the teaching profession is critical and vital in the community. The quality of teaching can be enhanced by providing decent salaries to teachers and comfortable work environment, which will spark their enthusiasm and hard work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
Many may argue that teachers salaries should be ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... the class. Moreover, appraising the students performance in the class as a holistic ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...earning experience. In contrast, if the teachers income is limited, the teachers will be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 532, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
... will deteriorate the students learning experience. In view of this, teachers should not s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...heir critical work in the classroom. In conclusion, the teaching profession is ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2200.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25059665871 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93773712917 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45584725537 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8769800744 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.95 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401779331071 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15288567371 0.0831039109588 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131826351153 0.0758088955206 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257854873835 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163705240854 0.0667264976115 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.