Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.

Technology is part and parcel of human life. Human has been using technology since the age of caveman that is with regards to what is cosidered as technology at their time. For cavemen technology was advancement in part of human to be able to generate fire, invention of wheel , spears to attack and hunt. Gradually, human developed and then came period of industrial revolution. Using steam engine, different medicinal techniques and first time using artificial light source, radio signals were technological advancements in that era. In todays world technology has got advanced. In current world, all these advancements are taken for granted and trivial. Today technology is turning towards finding cheaper and faster ways to travel like hyperloop, colonizing other planets like mars project of elon musk and finding faster ways to calculate like devicing quantum computers. Today we have prevelan technology like mobile phones, we can talk to anyone at any point of time from anywhere in the world. We have ways to travel anywhere at anytime, we have used technology to make our life easier like devicing devices like vaccum cleaner to clean the rooms. But, I will disagree to the argument that technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our life more difficult.
Sure thing that technology has given us some things which are deletorious for human beings like nuclear weapons and factories which as of now are harming nature but as is said every thing pros and cons. This is the worst side and we have to accept it along with all the advantages that weare getting using technology.
Technology helps us to get over mundane jobs and be judicious in using our time for something better. For instance, earlier we required to do long and tedious calculations by hands which would have taken ages but now it takes us fraction of time in doing these calculations. Has this slowed down our ability to count? Maybe, but this has helped us in a long run in thinking about more intricate things in which we require these calculations. Now we don't worry about distance from earth to mars or moon or speed required because now we have devices for those calculations. Instead, we are worried about the heat generation, it's effect , keeping in mind our ambitious goal of colonizing moon or mars.
Today we know about the harm that fossil fuels causes or what is the harmful effect of burnign trees. It is due to technology that we are able to think of experimenting on options to substitute fossil fuels and protect our resources and world from further depleting. Had it been the same scenario that was 200 years ago then we would have surely not been left with any resources causing trouble for mankind in general.
It is our technological advancement that has raised us up from all other species on the earth and being the dominant species. Had we not advanced from what we were during caveman time, we would have hunted also being attacked by other species and possibly extinct failing to succeed in rac of survival of fittest.
Technological advancement has not complicated our lives but has better to think about the better and interesting things in universe.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ble to generate fire, invention of wheel , spears to attack and hunt. Gradually, h...
^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...h we require these calculations. Now we dont worry about distance from earth to mars...
^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'mar'.
Suggestion: mar
...dont worry about distance from earth to mars or moon or speed required because now w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ed about the heat generation, its effect , keeping in mind our ambitious goal of c...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, may, so, then, while, for instance, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2643.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9126394052 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61501612382 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507434944238 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 843.3 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3227713186 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.72 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.52 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136005778366 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493886092556 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111024941712 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690896690136 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425011439679 0.0667264976115 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.