Modern society have a lot of issues, that didn’t exist before, in an earlier age. One of them is ecological problem in many parts of the planet. With an expansion of fabrics and population growth a lot of animal and plants species become endangered. Some people think, that society shouldn’t try to save them, especially if these actions costs a lot. Generally, I disagree with such position as it is human responsibility to protect nature.
Modern society is guilty in many environmental changes in many regions. As people invented new technologies, a lot of territories that were ecologically clean became a fabric zones. They provide society with needed goods, but pollute air, water, and most dangerously they limit the area where some species of animal or plants can live and reproduce. Due to that fact, flora and fauna of those places is not as abundant as it was before and sometimes very likely to extinct in a few decades. I believe, that society must take responsibility for it’s action and try to save endangered species no matter how much money and job it will cost. Government should provide money for such needs, as they are capable of allocating budget to any project they find important.
One can argue, that sometimes country is too poor to find money or the price is too big, so it can harm the economics of society, the well-being of its members. I do not argue, that it is true for some countries, in Africa for example. In those countries society have bigger problems that overshadow issues with endangered species. Maybe they should fight poverty first and then come back to help nature.
However, it doesn’t apply to richer counties with no sharp economical and social problems. They should consider endangered flora and fauna as important issue and fight it with all forces they have. In my opinion, well-being of a nature is critical to overall well-being of society. We will leave all our environmental problems to our kids and grandkids. Without our actions today, situation will not change itself, as plant and animals cannot fight back industrialization. A lot of they will extinct eventually. Our descendant will struggle live on a planet with limited animal and plant species, which of course can bring another ecological problems, such as lack of oxygen or polluted water. Personally, I don’t want my kids to live in such horrendous world, so I conclude that convergent society must save animals and plant even with great cost of money and jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ntries, in Africa for example. In those countries society have bigger problems that overs...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 546, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to live'
Suggestion: to live
...ventually. Our descendant will struggle live on a planet with limited animal and pla...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, well, for example, of course, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97380952381 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79376025669 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540476190476 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1908450119 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8260869565 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2608695652 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204519266637 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540157823549 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543822192915 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12334196366 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233581008372 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.