The increasing rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves

Nowadays we live in fast, technology advanced world with a lot of inventions and luxuries that makes our lives completely different from live of ancestors. Modern people usually have rapid pace of living and some believe that is causes more problem than it solves. Generally, I disagree with that opinion as there are a lot of everyday confirmation that proves that such point of view is not believable.
Humanity evolved a lot is past centuries and even decades. Present lifestyle with no doubt is more technology, socially and economically advanced compared to even lifestyle of our parents and grandparents. There are a lot of new technologies that revolutionized the world, social structure changed a lot as well. People can solve almost every problem very quickly, new opportunities are opened for every person regardless gender or race. Of course, such innovation changed pace of life as well, now it is fast and not as stable as it was before.
There is a point of view, that new lifestyle brought a lot of new problems that wasn’t experienced before. I partially, I agree with that. There is a big increase of stress-related illnesses in a society, there are some demographic problems as a lot of youngsters are not willing to create families and have kids. These are all new problems that wasn’t common within a past generation and it is all a result of rapid pace of live.
However, there are a lot of advantages that in my opinion overweight any disadvantages of a modern era. Advanced machines do a lot of work used to be done by man itself, which creates some free time person can devote to anything he or she wants. Abundant jobs economically secure society, so it quite rare to see individual that forced to fight for survival every single day of live.
For sure, people pay some price for those achievements with increased level of stress, social communication problems and other inconveniences. However, would it be greater to live like people in 19th or beginning of 20th century with no opportunity to choose career, have time for hobby, travel all around the world, with no inventions that will help with home work and without access to the any information you want anytime?

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rares'?
Suggestion: rares
...conomically secure society, so it quite rare to see individual that forced to fight ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, no doubt, of course, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.896 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88194255475 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8979574848 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0588235294 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164561865126 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533023378786 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845977871776 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858215338114 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578643703523 0.0667264976115 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.