There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.
Whether society should devote resources to saving endangered animals or plant species is not only related to the lives of species, but also to the environmental problems of the rest the world. Therefore, from my point of view, it is necessary for people to prevent endangered animals and plant species from extinction.
First of all, nature doesn’t belong only to humans; it belongs to other species too. Throughout history, large data showed that human activities – overhunting, overfishing directly caused the decreasing animal population. When it comes to justification, people should not have the right to hurt those species in the first place; thereby the society should fulfill their obligations of saving those species in case exacerbating the situation. Imposing severe punishments on illegal hunting and overfishing can reduce such violations and help people to protect endangered species. Also, if people do not take an appropriate move to prevent the extinction of those species, the costs of rescuing them later will be much higher. As a result, it is a responsibility for the society to save endangered species even though it will be an enormous cost in money and jobs.
Indeed, human and any other sort of species are interconnected in the ecosystem: animals provide food and living recourses for humans, humans engage in maintaining the ecosystem. With the decrease of certain animal and plant populations, the ecosystem would become imbalanced – losing one species will gradually lower species variety. If the society ignores those species in the mire, humans’ life will also be threatened. For instance, decreased forest covering rate will cause mudslides, CO2 increasing, and species habitat scarcity. Without ample habitats, species population will become endangered. Consequently, ignoring endangered species will lead the ecosystem to an irreversible situation.
However, some people might think that it is risky to save endangered species since people cannot guarantee their safety in the future, so it is reasonable to give up them. While with the interconnected ecosystem, any species extinction will somewhat affect the whole ecosystem. As a result, the society should figure out a way, predicting the potential threats in nature, eliminating the danger in case it imperils more species. Especially significant are those endangered animals, which have a higher value for scientific research because of its irreplaceability. So, it is imperative for people to save those endangered species for the ecosystem balance and further scientific exploration.
In conclusion, saving endangered species is reasonable because no single species can exist solitary in the ecosystem. Those endangered animals and plant species serve a significant role in human life, the effort of saving them is also the way to protect humans’ living environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rotect humans' living environment.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, as a result, first of all, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2452.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57272727273 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02322620626 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2573942728 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.761904762 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9523809524 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204912377532 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727425761066 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591117669606 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145003327808 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478666016159 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.