There is a great debate whether societies should devote money and resources to protect endangered species or not. While many societies have more critical perioties, I believe wealthy societies, which have enough resources, should play a vital role in protecting endangered species in this planet.
Humans, animals, and plants are parts of an ecosystem. This ecosystem should be equalized to ensure the survival of all its members. Unfortunately, humans played an active role in this ecosystem deteriorating. While nature laws confirm the survival of the strongest species , which are able to adopt to the environment, rapid urbanization and fast going industrial growth had deleterious effects on myriad of species. These effects put these species in the danger of distinction. For example, extensive hunting of animals for their fur,or rapid tree cutting for the production of paper had dangerous effects in the existence of these animals and plants, which is, in larger scale, speeding the climate change effects, and many other environmental critical issue.
There is no need to say, since humans had vital role in threatening the survival of many animals and plants species, societies have to do their parts saving endangered species. The survival of these species is crucial to the existence of other species on this earth, including humans. Animals and plants provide uncountable benefits to us. They are the main resource of food, they provide medicine, and they are used in scientific research which is vital for the development of societies. So, societies can not ignore the significant role which plants and animals play in building these community.
In conclusion, human dominance in this plant should have a positive side on saving and protecting other species. Societies should provide money and resources to support the efforts in endangered species protection
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rm the survival of the strongest species , which are able to adopt to the environm...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...e strongest species , which are able to adopt to the environment, rapid urbanization and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , or
...tensive hunting of animals for their fur,or rapid tree cutting for the production o...
^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e species is crucial to the existence of other species on this earth, including h...
^^
Line 8, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efforts in endangered species protection
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44027303754 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79353391545 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511945392491 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.2531034479 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.266666667 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73333333333 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205218349298 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753416135151 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673590257108 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142429826416 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465400055476 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.