The above statement recommends that society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. I do not agree that the efforts of society to protect the endangered species should be conditioned.
Plants and animals are disappearing at an alarming rate. It is a fact, more than five hundred species disappeared in less than two hundred years. This should be a call for all mankind to make an effort to save the endangered species since it is critical to the stabilization of the ecosystem. Animals and planets are vital parts of the natural system which we depend on, it is unreliable to assume if any species beneficial and critical to our existence or not since our scientific knowledge is not comprehensive, and there are many species are obscure but critical to the web of life.
Hence, it is our responsibility and our promise to the future generations to maintain the ecological balance on the planet we live on. Humans are the dominant and more advanced creature who has the most vigorous impact by using natural resources far beyond their naturally-sustainable levels. Also, the urban expansion, pollution, industrial waste, excessive use of fossil fuels, and much more, adversely affect the whole ecosystem and induce many environmental problems to the environment. So, since humankind has been active in the deterioration of the ecosystem, society should take an action to cure these effects as much as they can.
Moreover, they have the power and the tools, as technology and science, to protect the ecosystem and save the endangered species, either if they are under the risk of extinction as a result of human intervention or by natural causes. Endangered species often face extinction as a result of pervasive diseases, which may wipe out a large extent of animals or planets. The human intervention should deter the effect of these diseases by the use of scientific technology and research.
On the other hand, there are many natural factors which exacerbate the problem which we can not control, such as, hurricanes, floods, natural fires and other natural disasters. Moreover, there is a universal law state that the survival of the fittest, which assure that societies efforts to save the endangered species cannot keep up with the power of nature. Also, there are species that their extinction place no harm to the ecosystem balance, such as Dinosaurs and Mammoths, this may doubt our efforts to save some endangered species which their extinction may be harmless, especially if these efforts are costly.
In conclusion, societies should bolster any efforts to protect the endangered species. Particularly, if the danger of their extinction is a result of human intervention.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17256637168 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95113504567 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480088495575 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7448953256 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.888888889 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487546467545 0.243740707755 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160887956027 0.0831039109588 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19503496056 0.0758088955206 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295312124837 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.233292159832 0.0667264976115 350% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.