Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
History has shown time and time again that fortune only favours those who are willing to bet all on their beliefs against all odds. From the great inventors to great companies this saying has rang true. The ones to see their ideas through regardless of doubts or critisism expressed by others are destined for greatness and lasting leagcy.
Nikola tesla comes to mind when one thinks of people chasing their ideas to the bitter end, even in the face of harsh critisism from other people. Tesla kept on advocating for his invention, alternating current, even when people like, Thomas Edison , who were pioneers in the field opposed it and even tried to sabotage it. His genius and his pursuit for his ideas has established him as a modern day symbol of genius. To this day and many decades to come he will be remembered as the symbol of scientific genius.
In the current times, Elon musk dons the role of nikola tesla, braving the naysayers to puruse his ideas about the future. The fruit for his relentlessness pursuit can be seen in the success of many companies founded by him like SpaceX, Tesla PayPal etc. Like the invention of electricity revolutionized the world, elon's idea of resuable rockets has revolutionized the commercial space exploration and has opened up avenues for the exploration of mars and human settlements.
But ones passionate pursuit for his or her idea should not escape reality or reason. Nokia, a giant in the smart phone industry, was within a short amont of time was turned into hust of its former self. Nokia's insistance on its vision for the future of mobile and its resistance to take into the realities and the changes in mobile landscape lead to its downfall. If Nokia had taken cognizance of the rise in anroid, it can be argued it would have been a top player in current times.
History favours those who believe in themselves, their ideas and rewards them with greatness and lasting legacy. From past geniuses like Nikola Tesla to current time's Elon musk, history has shown belief in one's ideas is absolutely necessary for a lasting legacy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-06 | rahatumar9072 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Ruhani | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | the.umair__ | 75 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | keisham | 70 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 50
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 60
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'rung'.
Suggestion: rung
...tors to great companies this saying has rang true. The ones to see their ideas throu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nt, even when people like, Thomas Edison , who were pioneers in the field opposed ...
^^
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... Elon musk, history has shown belief in ones ideas is absolutely necessary for a las...
^^^^
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...story has shown belief in ones ideas is absolutely necessary for a lasting legacy.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82451253482 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49131825881 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565459610028 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.840793797 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.25 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.21951772744 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199800776027 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710785376072 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105762812116 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12480724222 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10354645259 0.0667264976115 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.