Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
An idea is the most crucial thing that is capable of transforming society and one must be free and determined to express his or her ideas regardless of what others say. I agree with the given statement that those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. I take this stance due to the following reasons.
First, a person should be determined enough to say what he or she feels right or wrong. The person shoud have the clarity of ideas and should be willing to put those ideas forth inspite of the reactions that other people may show towards these ideas. The people who follow this scheme in their life are remembered forever and their legacy becomes everlasting. For example, Aristotle expressed his ideas thoroughly and with utmost clarity on many topics without caring how people might react to it. As we know today, Aristotle is one of the most famous philosophers of all time.
Second, a person should not get affected by the opinions of society and thus, should not change his or her ideas due to the fear of the society. For example, at the time of Galileo, the church and the society used to believe that earth is at the center of the solar system. But, Galileo was firm on his idea that Sun is at the center of the solar system rather than earth. But the ideas of Galileo survived the tests of time and made him one of the most popular scientist of all time. Another example is that of Leo Tolstoy. Tolstoy was banished by Russian orthodox church for expressing his ideas. Today, the legacy of Leo Tolstoy speaks for itself.
Sometimes, if a large number of people are criticizing you, then it may be possible that your ideas are too parochial rather than being futuristic. For example, a person who does not recognize the human rights of LGBT community in 21st century will be strongly criticized by all parts of the society. This does not mean that the ideas of that person are too futuristic that society is not able to understand it, but instead, these ideas are too uncivilized to be accepted in the 21st century. Hence, in some cases it is better to introspect you ideas rather than being firm on them.
Thus, this topic may seem that it is intricate and complex. But after analyzing it thoroughly, we can say that those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism, tend to leave a lasting legacy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-24 | GeneralBlitzer | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 62
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos 50
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville Over the past three years there has been a marked increase in cases of sidewalk rage similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road but instead among sidewalk walkers The resul 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...toy speaks for itself. Sometimes, if a large number of people are criticizing you, then it may...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, then, thus, as for, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61520737327 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37311193591 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481566820276 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7252129252 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.380952381 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285151122103 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835766489813 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128310785265 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191267577636 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126409886338 0.0667264976115 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...toy speaks for itself. Sometimes, if a large number of people are criticizing you, then it may...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, then, thus, as for, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61520737327 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37311193591 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481566820276 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7252129252 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.380952381 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285151122103 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835766489813 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128310785265 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191267577636 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126409886338 0.0667264976115 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.