Before tendering my opinion, I think it is crucial to take a quick glance at arguments of both sides. Although some people may hold this view that major cities not presenting the community behalf of all types of characteristics, but others believe that you need to study major cities in which represent the variety of people. From where I stand, I concur with the second group in which major cities can offer diversity with better distribution in contrast to small cities and rural areas.
First of all, to study characteristics of a community u need to gather information first. I would like to point out reaching this point we need results corresponding to reality. In this regard, we have to focus to gather larger group with the variety of characteristics and it is not possible without using the data in which main cities can present. To illustrate this, let us look at the example of many social pieces of research that have been done in last decades. Consequently, we will realize most of them conducted in major cities and just a few of them because some special topics implemented in towns with low population. In this circumstance, obviously offered results by these research were realistic and used for creating new laws or bring more welfare to the society.
Furthermore, it is true that people in small towns may show different characteristics contrary to major towns. In this regard, the statistics engineering proved that whether or not you need to pick small size group as your main sample for research and it is not possible to make an investigation of the whole population.
Another important reason for picking major cities to understand characteristics of people is that more records are available in these towns. In the light of that, we can gather more trustable information about the history of changes in community and behavior of people. Henceforth, with the variety of data and records in major cities contrast to small towns we will find a better pattern for studying and understandings.
Along all these advantages, some may assert that major towns have many areas like china town. In this regard, people in these areas have the same tradition and show same charactersitics. Nevertheless, we can pick our samples from all of these areas. It is hard but not impossible if we want to propose a good answer and finding our favorite pattern.
Based on all points mentioned above, I strongly recommend major cities as the main sample for research on behavior and characteristics. By the same token, we will offer more realistic patterns of our status quo.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... the statistics engineering proved that whether or not you need to pick small size group as yo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and behavior of people. Henceforth, with the variety of data and records in major...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, so, i think, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to, it is true, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92660550459 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88461361493 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481651376147 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3035164023 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.21951772744 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153890579451 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456437742061 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456053881521 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836276864331 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486805576653 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.