Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t

Essay topics:

Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the
student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling
reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Whether the universities should required every students to take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of study could be further dwelt on. However, there is no guarantee that every student will benefit from it.

Admittedly, the speaker’s claim might appear to have considerable merit. After all, studying courses outside of the student’s field could boost one’s knowledge. Yet the speaker fails to provide a precise litmus test for measuring “which kind of students should take courses outside of the student’s field”. When we speak of “students”, the following come to mind: students with relative easy majors, students
with burdensome majors, student with ingenious talent, and students who struggle against academy institution. Obviously, students who have relatively burdenless majors or those who are overwhelmingly clever can handle or even enjoy the courses outside of the their fields, while others may not.

It is thus justifiable to take both clever and mediocre students in account, and we will find the statement problematic. Consider those who have struggled a lot just to make their own way to catch up the academy progress with in their own field. If they are required to take courses outside of their majors, we can already anticipate that those students might have a high chance to to encounter extraneous failures which they are not supposed to deal with if they don’t take these courses. As the result, the failure and the consequential influence such as depression is likely to outweigh the benefits of those courses outside of their field.

Moreover, the speaker unfairly assumes that by studying the courses outside of their field, students will benefit. However, their learning always depends primarily on their motivation and self-discipline. Even clever students who are able to learn things rapidly might fail to absorb the information they dislike by simply being inattentive to the subject. Therefore, studying subjects outside of one’s major cannot guarantee an ideal result, which may require additional regulations or encouragements to make the claim payoff.

In summary, this claim is not as persuasive as it stands. Although studying courses outside the student’s field of study could indeed benefit students, not all students are the same. If they are not driven or lack of interest in the subjects they participate in, or that they do not have time for extra tasks, the result will back fire no matter how great the intention and ambition of this claim is.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether the universities should required every ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents with relative easy majors, students with burdensome majors, student with ing...
^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...le or even enjoy the courses outside of the their fields, while others may not. It is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 380, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...those students might have a high chance to to encounter extraneous failures which the...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ying the courses outside of their field, students will benefit. However, their le...
^^
Line 10, column 327, Rule ID: BACK_FIRE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'backfire'?
Suggestion: backfire
...e time for extra tasks, the result will back fire no matter how great the intention and a...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, in summary, kind of, of course, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3184079602 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77242126048 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517412935323 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0841259199 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340789508533 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123588892785 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100190976457 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210350453026 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850591292858 0.0667264976115 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.