Education today holds a prominent role in establishing an effective and astute group of work culture. Today, students have got a divergent field of subjects and show an affinity towards these multifaceted fields according to their own interest and level of understanding. The colossal universities contain the corpus of such eclectic fields and the students should be given freedom to opt a particular field in which they are interested.
The formal education system that nowadays every student go through ends in high school. By that time, every student is clear with the subjects and field of a career that they want to pursue in future. They have already obtained sufficient knowledge about multifarious subjects and therefore, are well enlightened about the importance and salient features of each and every subject. This understanding helps them to take a sagacious decision in the future and ultimately analyze the career for which they are passionate. There is no point of imposing extra courses on the students again and ultimately, it will result as a burden over these adroit students and it will just enervate their potential to work and focus for the field in which they are really interested.
By enjoining students to take extra courses along with there fundamental subjects, the university going to enhance their time and focus. The outside companies and field will not get these potential and accomplished students on time as because of these extra courses, the students are going to divide their time and focus in other fields also which results in no boost for their major career and therefore, it becomes futile. For example, the student who aspires to study artificial intelligence and has to deal with statistical analyzing skills and divergent coding techniques is not going to be zealous with the idea of learning additional courses like interior designing or historical research. These courses will become tedious for that student and therefore, it will retrench the capabilities and concentration of that student.
Admittedly, in some cases the students are not clear with the type of career they are passionate about or they are confused between two fields. In that case, it would be judicious to opt for the additional course as it reduces the risk of taking the wrong decision. However, in the majority of cases that does not happen. And if such scenario happens then the university should provide additional courses only to such students who are in the need of that. There should be options for all the students whether they themselves want to pursue additional courses or not. For example, additional courses like communication skills could be beneficiary for them as it is used in all the fields of career. Also, by not imposing the additional courses will result in a cost-effective measure for the students as well, as they are then going to make use of their funds shrewdly in those courses which will be beneficial for them.
Therefore, because of these aforementioned arguments, the university should not impose additional subject on the students and should give them time and freedom to go through only those courses which are going to be beneficial for them in long run. This will reduce the time taken by the students to complete their overall courses and would also result in a salubrious understanding of a particular subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ld of a career that they want to pursue in future. They have already obtained sufficient ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, really, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2829.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 553.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1157323689 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7703459412 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426763110307 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 887.4 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7458554711 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31648828588 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109193874867 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643499356511 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200323088324 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308861317644 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.