We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Learning is inevitable, it does not depend on supporting or contradicting views more than it depends on learner's attitude. It is just a matter of time. If the facts are right than be it on contradictory side or supporting side, one will eventually get to know them, right then or may be later. For several reasons, it can be implied that learning is equal, independent of sides that people chose.
To begin with, one can always test the authenticity of acquired knowledge against the people who contradict what one believes. A discussion with people having opposing perspective, gives one insights on his own beliefs. Opponents tend to raise questions on fundamentals of your perspective and to answer those questions it is a requisite that you have a profound and clear understanding of what you are proclaiming. That is why, several government systems have the Right and Left wings. A strong opposition can elicit several flaws in any concept and sooner or later one will study and research for clearer understanding of those gaps.
Moreover, learning comes easy with those who share similar views. Discussion among people with same perspective is more amiable and it results in elaborating ones knowledge on topic of their interest. Experienced ones share their views while amateur ones develop deep understandings and ask questions. Take for an example, a discussion among team mates in any office. It is informative for those who are comparatively new and for seniors its helps to delineate what has to be done.
However, if the attitude of the person involved in discussion is limited to only winning the argument then the chance of him learning anything is zero. People often make senseless points under impression that they have the highest degree of knowledge. Under such cognition it is very difficult to learn, be it supporting views or opposing views, from any discussion.
Conclusively, as stated earlier learning depends on how people react to discussion with other peoples. One can be either introspective to edify and expand the horizons of knowleged or a gauche who gets nothing inside his head independent of perspective represented to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'learners'' or 'learner's'?
Suggestion: learners'; learner's
...radicting views more than it depends on learners attitude. It is just a matter of time. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one insight', 'an insight', or simply 'insights'?
Suggestion: one insight; an insight; insights
...ople having opposing perspective, gives one insights on his own beliefs. Opponents tend to r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e amiable and it results in elaborating ones knowledge on topic of their interest. E...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13559322034 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94541074833 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9620171598 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6842105263 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6315789474 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217139060298 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641554298081 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405874103682 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113165331037 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023130522687 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.