We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Acquiring knowledge is very important for the overall development of any individual. The author states that we can get more information and ideas from the people with whom our ideas share than from the people with whom our ideas contradict. The given topic is highly contentious, because different people have different opinions on the given topic. Some people may go for the topic, but some people stand completely against the given topic. I mostly agree with the given topic for the following reasons.
First of all, it is easier to get more ideas from the people, whose thoughts are alike with ours. We can easily discuss the given thoughts with him and can easily reach a conclusion. On the other hands, people with whom our ideas contradict, the discussion may impede learning process. It may take more time to reach a conclusion. For instance, a person from the physics want to discuss about a theory such as string theory of atomic physics, with his friends who oppose or cast doubts on the given theory and do not want to make a good judgment on the given topic. In that situation, it is very hard to reach a conclusive point.
Furthermore, sometimes it is possible that the opposing party deliberately make objection for the sake of his/her benefit. For example, when one political party purpose a ideas such as construction of airport. Though, this idea is also liked by the opposing party, but because of getting loss in next election opposing party deliberately hinder the decision making process. They thought that if the opposing party makes a more infrastructure, then their popularity is increased and it is very difficult for them to get higher votes in the next election.
However, by discussing any issues among the people having both share and opposing viewpoints, it is helpful to get ideas on the both sides of the view and the possible correction can be made if the purposed idea is flawed. Say, government brings a policy to ban abortion. Then by discussing among the people who thought that the banning the abortion is not a good things and a people who thought that the banning on abortion is a good thing, so the policy should be implemented. Only by discussions, booth pros and cons of any idea can be known and the subsequent correction can be made.
In a nutshell, though, through discussion among the people having opposing viewpoints, possible strength and weakness of the purposed idea can be known, but in many cases it hinders the learning process as some people deliberately put their negative point of view and takes longer time to reach a conclusion. Hence, we generally learn more from the people having common view than from the people having contrasting point of view.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...ict, the discussion may impede learning process. It may take more time to reach a concl...
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ample, when one political party purpose a ideas such as construction of airport. ...
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a idea' or simply 'ideas'?
Suggestion: a idea; ideas
...ample, when one political party purpose a ideas such as construction of airport. Though...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, such as, first of all, in many cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85344827586 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62156504776 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448275862069 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1638265128 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.238095238 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04761904762 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258935991542 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808698616957 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800482072203 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154637938753 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832218402744 0.0667264976115 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.