We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position

Essay topics:

We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Learning is a thing that mostly we could acquire from others, that’s why the people who teach us are much more influential on this aspect. The author states something like--people who matches their maestro’s interest or share their views at an extent can learn better than who doesn't. I am on the side of the above stated prompt and I have some aspects to delineate to clarify my position.

In some cases and in some fields, if one doesn't share the interests or views of his or her master, he never learns a thing for sure. Say artistic area of learning, mostly in musical area people who have an inclination to capture the style in which his or her boss plays the music or what sort of genre of music the teacher used to play, he or she must have the interest alike his master’s, otherwise he cannot get a single lesson. A bit feeling of a contradiction destroys the of learning. Only and if only the interests of teacher and student match, then a student can learn a song in the way of his teacher composes or used to play.

Moreover, in the field of sports say American football instance. The Similitude of views or of interests between a player and a coach is the first criteria how to kick a ball like a pro, if one wants such. People who are not like the way how their coach likes to play or are not familiar with the tactics what the coach is going to apply in the football pitch, never gets a chance in the team. How he could learn football from that very coach? Insofar, in the field of academia, a student cannot find any interests to learn a lesson if their teacher is a heretic person amongst them. The students actually start to hate the teacher instead of acquiring something from him.

However, we can see a lot of examples in the previous era, a student went against his teacher and found a more convenient way to invent a new path what previously unprecedented. In where he could gain more than his teacher had and invent the same thing in an easier and faster way what his master were trying for times. Suppose, in ancient Greece Plato’s student the great Aristotle went so far away than his masters in some extent by disproving some fallacious belief of his ancestors’.

In sum learning from both, weather the teacher is in my area of interest or not, can galvanize a learner to go forward.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...iews at an extent can learn better than who doesnt. I am on the side of the above s...
^^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... at an extent can learn better than who doesnt. I am on the side of the above stated p...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...n some cases and in some fields, if one doesnt share the interests or views of his or ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, sort of, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50704225352 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56015054751 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49765258216 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5723405331 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.941176471 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0588235294 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161590144287 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553531746702 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444765610363 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963143366994 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429452515624 0.0667264976115 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.