The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager.
"One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. I predict that modifying showerheads to restrict water flow throughout all twelve buildings in the Sunnyside Towers complex will increase our profits even more dramatically."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
In the latter the owner of the Sunnyside Towers Corporation stated that the recent strategy that to restrict the water limit throughout the all of its building would bring more profit than previous. The conclusion of the owner is flawed by numerous unwarranted assumptions. Weather the result would come true or not basically contingents on three evidence, needed to be authentically exemplified.
At first, There is no justified survey of actual water uses. How could the institution be assured enough that they must put some water uses restriction to profit further? There is a probability that all of the buildings except first three used to be viable on less water supply, after circumscribed the water supply won’t change anything to those other nine buildings consequently the Sunnyside Corporation have to pay same like previous for later ones. The conclusion is badly in need of an impeccable recordings.
Secondly, The Sunnyside Corporation’s owner talked about savings. Are there really be some savings? Perhaps, This system modification needs a extrenuous expenditure that eaten up their so called savings a bit. There might raise some mechanical problem to change the system as well. So we need a handful evidence in these aspects unless the conclusion would be weakened dramatically.
Finally, The latter stated that they have some unsatisfactory complaints though they are very few in number since the new modification implemented, it is very much possible that this new set up would face problems in near future there is no mathematical evaluation or something that can assure us there would be no complaints in future and the new set up is justified by the needs of all buildings.
In conclusion if the owner of this corporation would be able to provide these above analyzed evidence with subtle justification then it is probably said that they could catch their letter’s conclusion otherwise not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...it further? There is a probability that all of the buildings except first three used to be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'recording'?
Suggestion: recording
...usion is badly in need of an impeccable recordings. Secondly, The Sunnyside Corporati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...Perhaps, This system modification needs a extrenuous expenditure that eaten up th...
^
Line 13, column 95, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: few
...factory complaints though they are very few in number since the new modification implemented,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 95, Rule ID: FEW_IN_NUMBER[1]
Message: Use simply 'few'.
Suggestion: few
...factory complaints though they are very few in number since the new modification implemented,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by the needs of all buildings. In conclusion if the owner of this corporat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31715210356 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03948454375 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.016223174 60.3974514979 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.357142857 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141089781706 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493842770815 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652459765684 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817607830849 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701966425452 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.