Sometimes, the authority secure the sustainability of the society. But at the same time, unless the authority is well monitored and scrutinized, it can be harmful to the society and the members who living in there. So that the ways of questioning to the authority is the important issue.
In case that the question against authority is presented in reasonable ways, it is efficacious for both of individuals and society. Because it leads to the progress by overcoming the existing norm which is not proper for the contemporary period anymore. For example, in Joseon dynasty, the difference roles and statuses between women and men were accepted widely. However, after modernizing period, many people questioned to the culture, and finally materialize the equality between gender. And these equality allowed many women to participate in several activities, and eventually it has played salient role to enhance the happiness of individual women.
Moreover, the questioning to the authority is also beneficial for the society as a whole. Because the conforming to the authority without any question causes the lack of creativity which is crux of the development of the society. For instance, the size of industry of the steel in Korea which once achieved its huge success, now decreases, in virtue of the lack of creativity. And many economy experts analyze that the lack of creativity is happened because the new members of the industry habitually rely on authority of the existing members who achieved success before. However, it turned out that the lack of autonomy was deleterious to the industry. As we can see from the example, the creativity is important and it is gained by the ability of the questioning to authority.
However, if the question is made in the arbitrary ways, it causes several problems. First of all, the reckless questioning to the authority is resulted into the serious inefficiency. Because unconditioned objects from the various perspectives generate conflicts between opinions. For example, in Korea, the many people are divided into the party in politics and conflicting each other. In course of the fighting, many people unreasonably try to debunk the any attempts made by opposite side. And this conflicts makes huge inefficiency in politic, and hinder the actualizing any policy.
All in all, because the capacity to questioning to the authority has the positive repercussion, it should be encouraged. But as I mentioned, if the questioning is made in unreasonable ways, it causes a lot of conflicts. Therefore the question to authority should be made in reasonable ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ty and the members who living in there. So that the ways of questioning to the authorit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equality' or 'these equalities'?
Suggestion: this equality; these equalities
...ialize the equality between gender. And these equality allowed many women to participate in se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... beneficial for the society as a whole. Because the conforming to the authority without...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...resulted into the serious inefficiency. Because unconditioned objects from the various ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ble ways, it causes a lot of conflicts. Therefore the question to authority should be mad...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24582338902 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01933173281 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474940334129 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0735452981 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5652173913 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2173913043 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78260869565 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17029351004 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495010086594 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333498476081 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922877176944 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238178333697 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.