Governments make rules to protect people from danger, for example by making people wear seat belts in cars or not allowing smoking in public buildings. However, many people believe there are too many rule nowadays. Discuss both these views and give your o

Essay topics:

Governments make rules to protect people from danger, for example by making people wear seat belts in cars or not allowing smoking in public buildings. However, many people believe there are too many rule nowadays. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In this essay, I shall discuss the profit and obstacles of provide reason policymakers create regulation to safeguard society of the level accidents, so as construct safety first with wear seat belt in cars of forbidden smoking in public areas.

In 2013, the implementation of regulations that banned smoking in communal zone strictly monitored. This is not only prohibition smoking in public area, but also attire seat belt in cars. It is might be disciplined by policymakers for protection of factors accident rider on the highway exactly in Russia. It means the draft federal law “On protected by Public Health from the effects of Tobacco smoke and the consequences of Tobacco Consumption”. Russia Policymakers is practically the heaviest-smoking country in the world. People usually smoke in the most disadvantaged countries. There is, of course, a set of social habits and a certain way of life, but it is already common practice for people all over the world to take care of their health.

Although the most unpleasant thing that this is concern everyone not just smokers, as among as 80% of our people are affected by smoking. Tobacco kills nearly 400,000 people annually.

In Russia, on the other hand, there is several factors accident in this city, that caused by rider less control on high speed with a wet track, thus, obtain accident. It could be fractured spine, disability, and extreme accidents.

Nevertheless, smoking is the one famous of public news that regulated by policymakers in Russia contains contradictive on their instructions. Many societies, who against the ordinance from policymakers for disrupted public area.

Policymakers should be self-interest society, with provide building infrastructure such as area for smoking in each office and public area.

Votes
Average: 5 (6 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: In this essay, I shall discuss the profit and obstacles of provide reason policymakers create regulation to safeguard society of the level accidents, so as construct safety first with wear seat belt in cars of forbidden smoking in public areas.
Description: The token of is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to of and provide

Sentence: Policymakers should be self-interest society, with provide building infrastructure such as area for smoking in each office and public area.
Description: A preposition is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to with and provide

flaws:
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Different Words: 168 200
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5

Paragraphs are too short. Sentences are not developed smoothly.

better to use this pattern:

para 1: introduction. my opinion: A or B. agree or disagree
para 2: reason 1
para 3: reason 2
para 4: reason 3 (optional)
para 5: conclusion: because of reasons 1,2,3, so i agree/disagree.

Read essays by top users:
http://www.testbig.com/users/sfaht1
http://www.testbig.com/users/tessy-james
http://www.testbig.com/users/subodh860

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Characters: 1458 1500
No. of Different Words: 168 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.105 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.134 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.952 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.933 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.504 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.319 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.6 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.051 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5