The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The pie charts provide information regarding the comparison in kind of fuels that used to generate electricity in Germany and New Zealand between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, there were the different highest increase for specific resource between Germany and New Zealand. However, both of these countries had far less demand for natural gas in 2010.
A more detailed look at pie charts reveal that the much used resource in New Zealand was coal, and its proportion rose from 50% to 150%. However, this country did not use nuclear as their fuel in generating electricity. In contrast, there were the highest increase in utilizing nuclear in Germany (from 20% to 155%), while the proportion of coal remained unchanged, 28%.
It is interesting to see that the demand for hydro and petroleum in New Zealand and Germany were contrast. While hydro utilization rose from 30% to 46% in NZ, hydro percentage was far less in Germany, only 7% in 1980 and falling to 2% in 2010. On the other hand, the proportion of using petroleum decreased by 9% in NZ, while in Germany the demand of petroleum grew by 5%. It is worth noting that both countries reduced the use of natural gas in big amount, falling by 26-28%.
- Many languages are disappearing every year. Is this bad for the world or is it helps unify the human race? 65
- The diagrams below show two methods of using water to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The internet was probably the most significant invention of the last 30 years. Without it, our lives would be completely different. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 75
- Some people believe that unemployed people should be made to work for their welfare benefit payments Others however see this as cheap labour Discuss the possible advantages and disadvantages of making unemployed people take any job Do you believe that mak 82
- In many parts of the world, children’s lives were different from today. What do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of life fo children in the past? 77
fuels that used to generate electricity
'fuels used to generate electricity' or 'fuels that are used to generate electricity'
Sentence: Overall, there were the different highest increase for specific resource between Germany and New Zealand.
Description: The fragment the different highest is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace different with adverb
the much used resource in New Zealand was coal,
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
Sentence: In contrast, there were the highest increase in utilizing nuclear in Germany from 20 to 155, while the proportion of coal remained unchanged, 28.
Description: The fragment the highest increase is not usually preceded by were
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace were with was
Sentence: It is interesting to see that the demand for hydro and petroleum in New Zealand and Germany were contrast.
Description: A verb 'to be', past tense, 2nd person singular or all is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to were and contrast
Sentence: It is worth noting that both countries reduced the use of natural gas in big amount, falling by 26-28.
Description: The fragment is worth noting is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace worth with adverb
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 207 200
No. of Characters: 950 1000
No. of Different Words: 108 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.793 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.589 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.552 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 57 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.1 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.405 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.641 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4