The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table demonstrations the facts concerning the underground railway systems in six cities.

London has the oldest subversive railway schemes embracing the six cities. It was released in the year 1863, and it yet 151 years ancient. Paris in the second primogeniture, in which it was launched in the year 1900. This was then adhered by the unveiling of the railway structures in Tokyo, Washington DC and Kyoto. Los Angeles has the newest subterranean railway system, and was solely unwrapped in the year 2001. In parlance of the size of the railroad systems, London, assuredly, has the largest underground railway systems. It has 394 kilometers of route in total, which is nigh twice as large as the system in Paris. Kyoto, in contrast, has the smallest system. It only has 11 kilometers of route, which is more than 30 times less than that of London.

Interestingly, Tokyo, which only has 155 kilometers of route, serves the greatest number of passengers each year, at 1927 million fares. The systems in Paris has the second greatest number of lodgers, at 1191 million sitters per year. The smallest underground railway system, Kyoto, serves the smallest number of commuters per year as predicted.

In a nutshell, the underground railway systems in distinct cities vary a lot in the size of the system, the number of passengers served per year and in the age of system.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

it yet 151 years ancient.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?

Paris in the second primogeniture
Paris is in the second primogeniture

flaws:
No. of Words: 231 200

Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 10
No. of Words: 231 200
No. of Characters: 1103 1000
No. of Different Words: 103 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.899 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.775 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.64 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 80 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 56 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.487 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.404 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.565 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.147 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4