The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The chart gives information about visitors were using three different major airports in New York City from 1995 and 2000. Units are measured in millions of passengers.
Overall, LaGuardia was a popular airport for many visitors among all other airports in the given period. The trend of John F.Kennedy and Newark had a slightly different. Also, John F.Kennedy had a fluctuant trend from the beginning of the year to 2000 while Newark was a steady increased until 1998.
As it can be seen that, in 1995, most of traveller chose to travel with LaGuardia which had approximately 35m as opposed to John F.Kennedy and Newark were about 25m and 15m respectively. In term of LaGuardia airport, there was a significant rose for each year until 1999 with 50m passengers. After that, the number of passengers were increased to about 69m. With regards of John F.Kennedy, in 1997, it was peaked with about 47m passengers while LaGuardia and Neward had approximately 42m and 39m respectively. Furthermore, the trend of Newark airport remained unchanged from 1998 to 2000 with about 41m passengers.
The passengers of these airports were significantly rose up. However, passengers of John F.Kennedy were a slightly decline at the end of the year with approximately 42m.
The chart gives information about visitors were using three different major airports
The chart gives information about visitors who were using three different major airports
had a slightly different.
had a slight difference.
while Newark was a steady increased
while Newark was steadily increased
while Newark has a steady increase
passengers of John F.Kennedy were a slightly decline
passengers of John F.Kennedy had a slight decline
Sentence: Also, John F.Kennedy had a fluctuant trend from the beginning of the year to 2000 while Newark was a steady increased until 1998.
Error: fluctuant Suggestion: fluctuate
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 12 10
No. of Words: 212 200
No. of Characters: 1019 1000
No. of Different Words: 106 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.816 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.807 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.765 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 52 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.284 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.405 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.616 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4