The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar chart describes the travellers number who were using three New York’s main airports between 1995 and 2000.
Generally, the number of travellers at LaGuardia airport almost doubled during 1995-2000. The LaGuardia visitors were moderately increasing during 1995-1997, but it then dropped for the next following two years before rising again in 2000. Showing the same pattern, the Newark airport visitors rose progressively for the first three years, then 1999 to 2000 saw a steadiness.
Comparatively, LaGuardia airport was the most visited airport in 2005 with 35 million visitors, while John F. Kennedy and Newark airport followed behind it with the total number of visitors around 27 and 18 million respectively. Then, the visitors of these three airports moderately increased in 1996 with total travellers around 40, 35, and 25 million respectively. Next, the number of visitors who were using these airports rose again in 1997, but their positions changed which John F. Kennedy, LaGuardia, and Newark airport placed one, two, and three respectively with the highest number of visitors in New York City. While LaGuardia’s visitor continued to increase for the next two following years, the number of visitors of Newark airport saw a steadiness around 42 million during 1998-2000. Differently, John F. Kennedy visitors slightly reduced in 1999 to 32 million, before they climbed to 44 million in 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47085201794 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81067562058 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520179372197 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2402112418 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223198325346 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10419817742 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101134866688 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229663218947 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121272807552 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.