Given is the line graph which illustrates the proportion of population aged 65 years and over in three nations: USA, Sweden and Japan from 1940 to 2040.
Overall, the early population trend in the US is similar to the trend in Sweden, whereas the early population trend in Japan is different. In three countries, the estimations of older citizens expect to increase significantly.
The first thing to mention is that both Sweden and the US have fairly identical population trends. From 1940 to 1960, the elderly population rates in both countries were lower than 10 percent, after that the figures rose to approximately 15 percent in 1980. In 1990 and in 2010, the elderly population numbers in Sweden went up to 15% and 20%, respectively, whereas the US elderly population was still under 15%. However, during 2030 to 2040, it is also projected that the older population in both nations will increase gradually together and the US figure will reach to 23% in 2040, while the Sweden figure will rise to 25%.
On the other hand, in Japan, the demographic of aging population is different as its started at 5% and and its dropped to under 5% until 2010. After that, the figure will rise dramatically to 10% in 2030 and increase rapidly to 28% at the end of this period.
- Education is a lifelong task In what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The pie charts below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s (rewrite). 80
- I have got the IELTS score today writing 7 5 over all band 7 I would like to thank you this site so much 82
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 65
- A healthy person is often described as someone who has a good diet gets a lot of exercise and avoids stress What do people do to stay healthy in your country 59
flaws:
The third paragraph could be developed better.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 221 200
No. of Characters: 1010 1000
No. of Different Words: 109 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.856 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.57 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.609 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 47 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.882 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.421 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.678 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.161 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4