The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causesaffected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make

Essay topics:

The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes
affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart illustrates the causes that lead to lesser fertility of agricultural land, worldwide. The table lists how these factors affected different continents of the world during the 1990s.

According to the pie chart, the major causative factor for the decline in productive capacity of agricultural land all over the globe is over-grazing, accounting for 35percent. It is followed by deforestation and over-cultivation, at 30percent and 28percent, respectively.

The table provides information regarding sources of land degradation in North America, Europe and Oceania, specifically during the 1990s. In North America, total land degraded was 5percent, of which 3.3percent was due to over-cultivation. In Europe, total area affected was 23percent, of this 9.8percent was due to deforestation. In Oceania, which constitutes Australia and New Zealand, total degraded land was 13percent, of which 11.3 percent was due to over-grazing. In Oceania, over-cultivation didn’t account for any damage to farming land.

To summarize this, the largest cause of land degradation worldwide is over-grazing, while in specific regions during the 1990s, over-cultivation was the major causative agent in North America, deforestation in Europe and over-grazing in Oceania. Of all these three regions, Europe was affected the most, while North America was the least affected.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)

Comments

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 204 200
No. of Characters: 1127 1000
No. of Different Words: 99 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.779 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.525 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.282 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 80 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.545 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.611 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.273 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.423 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.651 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.127 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4