11 The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002

Essay topics:

11. The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.

The picture compares figures for people per 100 million passenger miles travelled involved in incidents and got injuries in terms of five different types of public transportation in 2002.

It is noticeable that in most incidents and injuries took place when people choose to travel due to demand response, while commuter rail services recorded the lowest number of incidents and injuries.

We can see that 173 passengers injured in the total of 255 incidents, per 100 million passenger miles travelled, recorded for demand response services. By contrast, there were only 20 incidents for people taking commuter rails with 17 injuries, accounting to less than 10% for those choosing demand response services. However, the proportion of passengers getting hurt was higher for commuter rail than demand response services.

The numbers of people who involved in incidents were the same for taking the bus and taking light rail (76 per 100 million passenger miles travelled), ranking together as the second-highest figure. There were 66 people got hurt in bus incidents and just 39 in light rail ones. Heavy rail services saw a total of 51 incidents and 35 injuries per 100 million PMT in 2002.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21243523316 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67518126637 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8649013707 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330401044276 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165581866255 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126901494329 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232186812061 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114435776674 0.0819641961636 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.