14 2 2019 and 20 8 2022 The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012

Essay topics:

14.2.2019 and 20.8.2022: The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992, 2002 and 2012.

The table illustrates the amount of plant and animal based products consumed by a person in a certain European country between 1992 and 2012.
Overall, most consumed food was vegetables while cheese was the less food consumption. Also, meat consumption decreased but all other food increased.
Plant-based products had an increasing trend over 20 years. The highest portion of people’s food intake was the number of vegetables consumed at 2140 grams in 1992, and rose slightly and reached 2220 grams in the last ten years. At the same period time, the figure for wheat increased to 997 grams while that for beans went up moderately to 590 grams in 2012.
The rest of the food intake including meat and dairy products both increased in the first period, more meat was consumed than fish, by 100 grams and 12 grams respectively. There was a small rise of more than 60 grams in the amount of meat in 2002, however, the figure dropped back to 1132 grams in 2012. Cheese made up the smallest part of people’s diet with only 113 grams in 1992 and 125 grams in both 2002 and 2012.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40477940546 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4380276471 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160144728685 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769743525785 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602878434062 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120278725483 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067170331647 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.