5. The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart gives information about one country’s export earnings in five categories from 2015 to 2016, and the table demonstrates the difference in the percentage between the two-year period in the five items.
Looking at the bar chart, petroleum products, with about 60 million dollars in 2015 and 62 million dollars in 2016, ranked the top export earning products in this country in these years, whilst engineered goods and gems and jewellery followed as second and third, changing from 58 to 61 million dollars and 43 to 41 million dollars respectively.
In the table chart, similar trends can be noticed among the categories except that of gems and jewellery from 2015 to 2016, with a drop of 5.18%. At the same period, textiles witnessed the most significant increment of export earnings (15.24%), whilst the total earnings made from engineered goods, petroleum products and agricultural products rose by 8.5%, 3% and 0.81% separately.
Overall, petroleum products were the most profitable export goods while textiles were the least category. Same increasing patterns can be noticed for all the items’ export earnings exclude that of gems and jewellery.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the two-year period in the five items. Looking at the bar chart, petroleum prod...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31720430108 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68219227381 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.5 43.030603864 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.833333333 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238778853712 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124162027794 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098937996406 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156626665315 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868161942417 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.