The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The two floorplans demonstrated changes in a public park from it was built in 1920 to today. There were several new features, rearrangement and abundance of old places.
Looking at the plan in 1920, there were two main entrances which were the north entrance in Arnold Avenue and the south entrance in Eldon street. Entering through either gate, people would see a huge fountain and a stage for musicians next to it. All the seats and three small rose gardens spread around the park. In the north-east area, which next to one of the rose garden, was a pond for water plants. Opposite the pond was a glasshouse.
As we can see in today’s plan, the park remains the two main entrances while there is one more entrance in the south-east site, locating in the new underground car park. Leaving the car park, visitors can see a water feature area, taking over the glasshouse, and a playground for children and a café next to it. In the middle of the park, there is a fairly large rose garden around with all the seats, which replaces the old fountain. Instead of the stage, there is a magnificent Amphitheatre for concerts in the west part of the park.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6359223301 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5065518821 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3591016934 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8181818182 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169068482979 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637449618465 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616724870304 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125405298282 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478812723517 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.