AGREE OR DISAGREE CHILDREN SHOULD LEARN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE LIKE ENGLISH EARLY

Essay topics:

AGREE OR DISAGREE? CHILDREN SHOULD LEARN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE LIKE ENGLISH EARLY

Language is one of the means of communication between people. If you can speak one or more languages, you can communicate with many people. Although a person can learn a language at any ages, a young age is more suitable, because children can easily acquire a foreign language and they have more time at that period of time. So in my perspective, I totally agree with the opinion of learning a second language soon.

Firstly, children are as white papers so they can learn and explore a new language without nany problems. And also because they understand things more quickly than others. For example, if your child studies a foreign language when he is four years old, after just three months you can clearly see that he will be able to speak that language fluently.

Secondly, children are free to learn a new language. While adults are so busy with their work, the youngsters don’t have to do such a huge amount of work like that. So they are able to have time to study a language. For instance, when my niece was five years old and he didn’t need to do anything, just playing and playing. And I think that five is the suitable age to study a second language like English.

In conclusion, I am fully support that learning a foreign language soon is useful. Because children can effectively obtain a remote dialect and they can spend more time studying a language. And in my view, this opinion will always be supportive by a lot of people even in the future.

Votes
Average: 5.3 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ication between people. If you can speak one or more languages, you can communica...
^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...anguage and they have more time at that period of time. So in my perspective, I totally agree ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 5.60731707317 464% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63878326996 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53342101434 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536121673004 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 1.07073170732 747% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5175284773 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3333333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230091165944 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830722847876 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742940943786 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141602685092 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021501132484 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.