Ashdown museum
The pie charts illustrate how many explorers visit Ashdown Museum before and after its refurbishment, and the
survey's result based on the opinions of that particulars periodwise satisfaction level.
Overall, the total number of sightseers augmented after the renovation of the Ashdown museum,
At the time before redecoration, the greatest segment was made by the dissatisfied people while after reorganizing the museum the percentage of satisfied individuals moderately increased. However, survey results
which depict no response did not alter in advance and following an interval of the modification of that historical gallery.
Participants who observe the museum had a modest growth from 74000 to 92000 which reflects the percentage
accounted for very satisfied people rise to 35%. However, the previous percentage was 15%. Satisfied people was 30% prior to the reorientation of the archive house
and had a slight rose of 5% after the redesign.
Dissatisfied people accounted for 30% of the explorers' study of contentment in the previous time of redecoration and
experienced a more than twofold decrease to 15% after refurbishment. The percentage of very dissatisfied people which comprised
the one tenth of the chart before redesign declined from 10% to 5%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er the renovation of the Ashdown museum, At the time before redecoration, the gre...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... slight rose of 5% after the redesign. Dissatisfied people accounted for 30% of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61855670103 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13646133935 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582474226804 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6199998095 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189361895168 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745085428314 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10726447266 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077398620486 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122945108222 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.