The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of people living in urban areas for 6 continents in three different time periods (1950, 2007 and 2050).
Overall, there is an increasing trend seen in urban population across all the continents. North America had the highest percentage of citizens living in urban areas in 1950 and also projected to remain highest at the end of 2050, whereas Africa had the smallest proportion of population residing in urban localities and it remains that way till 2050.
Regarding Africa, in 1950 it had only 15% of its population living in urban areas. This number rose gradually to 62% in 2050. Following almost the same trend of Africa, Asia's urban population steadily rose from 17% in 1950 to 66% in 2050. In contrast to above two continents, Oceania had a higher percentage of urban population in 1950 (62%) but the 12% increase in its percentage over a century was very insignificant as compared to other continents.
Europe's urban population stood at 51% in 1950 which grew dramatically by 21% till 2007 and at last is expected to be 84% by the end of 2050. the urban population of Latin America also took a significant jump from 42% in 1950 to 76% in 2007 and is predicted to be 89% by 2050. In case of North America, a very gradual upward trend is seen in urban population from 64% in 1950 to 79% in 2007 which is expected to increase further by 11% till 2050.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ities and it remains that way till 2050 also. Regarding Africa, in 1950 it had on...
^^^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... expected to be 84% by the end of 2050. the urban population of Latin America also ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, whereas, as for, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67068273092 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65516827145 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497991967871 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5470551692 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.3 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146141317954 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710690580452 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430787164361 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113281185717 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037902269053 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.