The bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The chart compares the water consumption in three distinct sectors among China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010. It is clear that the water used in agriculture was more than in both industry and domestic activities; and the most significant percentage was recorded in China.
In the USA and Russia, the majority of water was used in industrial sector (about 44% and 60% respectively). Meanwhile, the second rank belongs to agricultural activities; and people in the USA spent about 38% on these as opposed to the Russian at 30%. The water usage in domestic sector was the least popular, with only 19% in the USA and 10% in Russia.
Additionally, although Chinese and Australian consumed the least amount of water for industrial activities (about 8% and 3% respectively), the ratio of water consumption in the others was slightly different. While most of the water in China was spent on agriculture (approximately 85%), Australian expended almost 61% of the total water consumption on domestic tasks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Water
... this as opposed to the Russian at 30%. water usage in domestic sector was the least ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... only 19% in the USA and 10% in Russia. Additionally, although Chinese and Austr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... water consumption on domestic tasks.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16770186335 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94420420706 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5643440203 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199051765974 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112062325935 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658566444928 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15095150471 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464682546109 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.