The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25-44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This bar chart or column chart compares the rate of income of men in percentage by their homeland in Sydney as a whole. It is observed that the data represented by the graph represent inevitable interesting and insightful fluctuations.
In general, it would seem that men who were born in Australia earn more than that of overseas.
Regarding the chart, most of the Australian men(35%) earn between 600$ and 1000$ that put them in the middle group while most of the overseas earn between 300$ and 600$, which placed in the lower-middle group(just under 35%). On the flip side, merely under 15% of natives earn less than 300$(the low-income group), but this amount for men who were born outside of Australia reach above 20%.
20% of Australian-born men earn more than 1000$(the high-income group), 10% more than that of men born overseas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$600'.
Suggestion: $600
...t of the Australian men35% earn between 600$ and 1000$ that put them in the middle g...
^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1000'.
Suggestion: $1000
...Australian men35% earn between 600$ and 1000$ that put them in the middle group while...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
...while most of the overseas earn between 300$ and 600$, which placed in the lower-mid...
^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$600'.
Suggestion: $600
...t of the overseas earn between 300$ and 600$, which placed in the lower-middle group...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 686.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83098591549 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64219683713 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619718309859 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.014532428 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199163937768 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107210064853 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066476776027 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133844966968 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251422878027 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.