The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25-44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the percentage of men who are native to Australia and from abroad, both the groups are youths and based on four different income categories in Sydney.
Overall, The population who are borned in Australia have maximum ratio of middle level income but the least population has low income. Whereas, the people from other nations have minimum level for high income also most significant proportion of people are in lower middle income range.
According to the chart, firstly, the minority of people who are originated in Australia have low income level, it is just under 15%. About 5% more people have high income, where more than half population are in the order of lower middle and mid range of income. People withstanding lower income group has 30% but the income group of $600 to $1000 has a majority with a ratio of a third.
Secondly, Those who are non-native to Australia has a small ratio of people earning more than $1000,
which was 5% less than Australian born. The middle income ranges population is just above a fifth. In addition, people earning less than $300 and between $300 and $600 are more than other group, lower middle group have approximately a third ratio, and it is highest among all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t compares the percentage of men who are native to Australia and from abroad, bot...
^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s in Sydney. Overall, The population who are borned in Australia have maximum ratio ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the order of lower middle and mid range of income. People withstanding lower inc...
^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople withstanding lower income group has 30% but the income group of 00 to 000 ha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78773584906 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40535976664 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495283018868 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9687347263 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.777777778 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13574418385 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071829669784 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582548505486 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924660420227 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629147732405 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.