The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.

Essay topics:

The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.

The table illustrates the count of male, female employeer, and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.

In overall, men's population is dominant throughout the period than female, and the number of factories is massively raising. An increasing number of industries are inversely proportional to the mean count of employees.

The men population is 287,100 in 1851 which is the excessive value throughout the period, but 10 years after it is rapidly reduced to 131,780 whereas the factories number were increased 225 to 227. After a decade of reduction in the male worker is still continuous, whereas the industries development peaked by nearly 200%. The steady deduction is ongoing till 1901 and have just 31,000 men worker by the end. In the case of factories it expanded its count to 721 by the next 10 year period, after a 20-year count of the worker as well as factories reduced.

Again, Female workers are 190,000 while starting but the downfall of the workers is there for 30 years and the count is reduced to 60,000. For the next half, every decade 10,000 peoples are deducted, while having just 30,000 total women working for a factory. Total count of fully dependent on men and women so is reducing its value within the entire period.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...In overall, mens population is dominant through out the period than female, and number of f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...00 in 1851 which is the excessive value through out the period, but 10 year after it is rap...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'industries'' or 'industry's'?
Suggestion: industries'; industry's
...le worker is still continuous, also the industries development peaked by nearly 200%. Stea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...r period, after 20 year count of worker as well as factories reduced. Again, Fe...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, well, whereas, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92647058824 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51020121702 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3679106953 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0505268750615 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239662518414 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267106113532 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0352510814074 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328543988332 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.