The bar chart below shows employment figures in different tourism-related industries between 2009 and 2019. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The chart demonstrates transaction figures in diverse-related industries given in numbers between 2009 and 2019.
Overall, this chart is able to be the source of identification of employment figures and determine total number of service in different effectual industries between two years.
First of all, employment quantity became low enough in some types of industries in 2009. For example, the lowest figures of tourism industry were travel and culture which owned the quantity of 60.9 and 82.8 respectively. Even though there were some low level of existence in the year of 2009, high level of available tourism-related industries helped to promote total number of employment form as well. For example, topmost owned number was in Hotel industry because of having employment necessity, approximately, 299.2. Secondly, in the year of 2019, appearance of huge distinction observed in various industries . For example, total employment in 2019 gained massive extent, approximately, 1400 thousand. Hotel industry also achieved to the peak in accumulation of huge quantity, namely, 306.0 . Truly, perfect superiority was contemplated in all types of tourism-related industries as much as possible
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iven in numbers between 2009 and 2019. Overall, this chart is able to be the so...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffectual industries between two years. First of all, employment quantity became...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...stinction observed in various industries . For example, total employment in 2019 g...
^^
Line 3, column 803, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mulation of huge quantity, namely, 306.0 . Truly, perfect superiority was contemp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68156424581 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23956719967 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586592178771 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7035467668 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262520351428 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117330890986 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065310339869 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209547385556 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461813331655 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.