Given are the bar chart contrasting the numbers of males and females enrolling distinct courses at an adult education centre and the proportion of the ages of these courses participants in the year 2009.
Perceptibly, the number of females registering to almost courses was much higher than that of their opposite sex except for the sculpture. Likewise, the rate of the over-50s accounted for by far the largest part of the courses members.
Regarding the volume of the participants, females doubled their opposite sex in the language and the drama with 40 and 20 members respectively while the opposite was true in the sculpture with 10 members. In the painting, there was a less of 5 in males compared to the opposite sex although it ranked first in the figure of males.
According to the percentage of students categorized in ages ranges, the over-50s had by far the highest percentage of participants which was as the same as the sum of the proportion of the 40 to 49-year-olds and the 30 to 39-year-olds with 26 and 16 percent in sequence.This was also true for the people aged 30 to 39 in comparison with the group of 20 to 29 years old and the under-18s with 11 and 5 percent respectively.
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar chart contrasting the numbers o...
^^^
Line 4, column 270, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...olds with 26 and 16 percent in sequence.This was also true for the people aged 30 to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, likewise, regarding, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92709602789 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.680081724 43.030603864 250% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.0 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203504374444 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116220163498 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174967073851 0.0843802449381 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163668852155 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19792529905 0.0819641961636 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.