The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010

The bar chart below presents the proportion of people in Australia who did ordinary physical exercise in 2010. They come from different age groups.

As we can see from the graph the highest percentage appeared in women from 45 to 54 with 53.3%. Women also trained more physical activity than men in almost all age groups, except age 15 to 24.

The difference in the amount of physical activity trained by gender was huge in the middle age, while it narrowed down in early age and elderly age. Especially in age 65 and over the difference went down to just 0.4%, comparing to 13% of difference in age 35 to 44. In addition, women paid much time practicing exercise when they were in a middle age, while in contrast men in young and old age trained more than them in the middle age, with the highest proportion of 52.8% in age 15 to 24.

In conclusion, the highest percentage in each gender didn't show much difference. However, the lowest proportions in age groups belonged mainly to men, who also did less exercises than women.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...They come from different age groups. As we can see from the graph the highest p...
^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
..., the highest percentage in each gender didnt show much difference. However, the lowe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun exercises is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ps belonged mainly to men, who also did less exercises than women.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64130434783 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46410909831 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5083676121 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8888888889 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400468935201 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164288975026 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743163981552 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248722240201 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05461593332 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.