The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates, aged 20-24, in one European country over a two-year period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
Given is a bar chart comparing the data on unemployed of male and female who graduated in on European nation over the period of 2 years since 2008.
In general, it is evident that both the unemployed rate of male and female was an upward trend. Besides, the percentage of mem was higher than the proportion of women.
Concerning Male, at the beginning of the period, the data accounted for 10% before declining to 8% until July, 2008. But in the next 3 months, there was a quick growth to 16% follow by a reduction to 11% in July, 2009,. For the rest of the period, the unemployed percentage of men witnessed a dramatic rise to 22%.
Regarding Female, similar to male, in 2008, the figure decreased steadily from 8% to 6% in january and July, respectively. However, the proportion of female went up rapidly to 11% before decreasing 6%. until April, 2009. In next 6 months, there was a significant increase to 14%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | Venkata Saikiran | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-13 | HuyenB1 | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 11
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 11
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 11
- The diagram below shows the process of milk production 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...over the period of 2 years since 2008. In general, it is evident that both the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_MONTH_DATE[1]
Message: The comma is probably incorrect: 'July 2008'.
Suggestion: July 2008
...ed for 10% before declining to 8% until July, 2008. But in the next 3 months, there was a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_MONTH_DATE[1]
Message: The comma is probably incorrect: 'July 2009'.
Suggestion: July 2009
... to 16% follow by a reduction to 11% in July, 2009,. For the rest of the period, the unemp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... men witnessed a dramatic rise to 22%. Regarding Female, similar to male, in 20...
^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Until
...up rapidly to 11% before decreasing 6%. until April, 2009. In next 6 months, there wa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_MONTH_DATE[1]
Message: The comma is probably incorrect: 'April 2009'.
Suggestion: April 2009
...idly to 11% before decreasing 6%. until April, 2009. In next 6 months, there was a signific...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, regarding, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62804878049 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65093874027 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4193259667 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.9 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107665951425 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392214874324 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565652467289 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753668472548 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680606399624 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.