The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Given is a line graph illustrating that the proportion of fast food including pizza, fish and chips and hamburger that young adults consumed in Australia over the period of 25 years since 1975. In general, while the figure for hamburger and pizza increased. Besides, the data on fish and chips experienced a reverse trend.
Concerning fish and chips, at the beginning of the period, the rate was highest and it went down steady to 80% until 1980. In next 5 years, there was a slight rise to nearly 100% before it saw a dramatic decline to 40% for the rest of the period.
Regarding hamburger, the rate grow quickly to over 80% in first 10 years and rasing to 100% until 1995 before the number remained the same for the rest of the period. The data on hamburger exceeded the figure for fish and chips in 90% at 1985.
Similar to hamburger, in first 10 years, there was a slight grow to 30% before it went up quickly to over 80% until 1995. The percentage of fish and chips went below the proportion of pizza in over 60% in 1990 and the rate saw a plateau at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Sheetal Bataniya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | asdasdasd | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Ashley Cheung | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | iamkristinjoi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 11
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 11
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 11
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 wor 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, regarding, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40099009901 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30021224561 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475247524752 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3792402008 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0616154752799 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0260449171087 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626229620757 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0396656371409 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567174543932 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.