As it is very clear, that a healthy life lives in a healthy diet but craving of having fast food, could successfully change a person's mind. And here the following graph, is remarkably showing the amount of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers particularly from 1975 to 2000.
It is clearly showing that fish and chips consumption dramatically decreases from 1975 to 2000 and at the end of the 2000 it remains less than half of past years. While on the other hand, the demand of Hamburgers, hitting more and more, year by year and between 1995 to 2000, it crosses over 100 (no. of items eaten per year). Graph of Pizza, also increases with a very fast rate but after 1995 to 2000 it remains constant and that is a good sign of a healthy country that people are becoming more aware about their health.
As the graph is clearly displaying, the consumption of fast food items like Hamburgers and pizza, has been drastically increasing, which is definitely not a positive output for a human health. It is good to see the graph line of Fish and chips, regardless of other fast food items containing more carbs and fatty acids.
According to my opine, people must have to take care of their health first, because a healthy diet brings more years to person's life and also makes him more active.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'no' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'noes', 'nos'.
Suggestion: noes; nos
...tween 1995 to 2000, it crosses over 100 no. of items eaten per year. Graph of Pizz...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64502164502 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4463279686 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7596864973 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311156594931 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134806083976 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167862708144 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187311762107 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160727189323 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.