The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph provides information about how australian young people consumed pizza, fish and chip, and hamburger in different several times between 1975 and 2000. In general, as we can seen that the teenagers whose consumed pizza and hamburger were increased. While the amount of times eaten fish and chip were decreased over the years.

Beginning with 1975 to 1980, according to the graph there was a variation number of times eaten fish and Cheap during this period, pizza rose slightly over 18 times and finally there was a quick grow over 80 times gobbled by australian adolescents. Then, when it comes to 1985 to 1990 the bigger rise was seen on hamburger than pizza as a favorite meals they were utilized jump sharply to 82 times.

Dramatically contrast in 1990 to 2000; fish and chip no longer being as popular food because it fell steeply time by time throughout period, where in 1990 to 1995 about 100 times people ingested hamburger than pizza. And at the end phase, which is five years ahead from 1995, the portion of devoured hamburger and pizza was remained constant.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...en 1975 and 2000. In general, as we can seen that the teenagers whose consumed pizza...
^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'meal'?
Suggestion: meal
...n on hamburger than pizza as a favorite meals they were utilized jump sharply to 82 t...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88108108108 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35469783607 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3304065065 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105162623498 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553929814132 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047579036432 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788302450705 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455984746576 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.