The bar chart below shows the preference for different types of Complementary or Alternative Medicine CAM therapies among US adults in 2007 The table lists which therapies where the most popular over two years

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the preference for different types of Complementary or Alternative Medicine (CAM) therapies among US adults in 2007. The table lists which therapies where the most popular over two years.

The infographics demonstrate the proportion of the benefits and popularity of Complementary and alternative medicines among American youngsters from 2002 to 2007.

Overall, it is axiomatic that maximum relief was obtained by deep breathing in both years, whereas in the latter year natural products had been utilized significantly.

By casting a fleeting glance, it is evident from the table that highest ratio of young Americans got treatment by deep breathing that account for 10.6 in 2002, however after five years, the percentage inclined to 7. Meanwhile, yoga was used by almost half of the people of States as compare to deep breathing. By contrast, similar ratio of meditation and massage had been witnessed in 2002 and 2007 respectively.

Further scrutinizing the details of column graph, almost 18% Americans were using natural products for their treatment in 2007 followed by deep breathing and meditation noticed around 13% and 9% sequentially. Interestingly, next three therapies had been used by nearly same percent of American adults. Whilst, least people opted for homeopathy treatment.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ssed in 2002 and 2007 respectively. Further scrutinizing the details of column grap...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
... same percent of American adults. Whilst, least people opted for homeopathy treatment. ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54705882353 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00028257031 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641176470588 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9663682492 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113233328365 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506017617737 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510145501228 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783799698225 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608222537566 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.